TRUE 2.0 — rebuilt around evidence.
We rebuilt the product around a single principle: an answer you cannot check is worse than no answer at all. Here's what changed, and what we deliberately took out.
For research and education. Not financial advice.
What we changed
The first version of TRUE did what most AI finance tools do: it answered confidently. It was fluent, it was fast, and it was — we eventually admitted — impossible for a user to verify. That's a fine property for a chatbot and a terrible one for a research tool.
Every answer now shows its work
A brief has four parts, in this order: the short read, the data TRUE actually checked, what remains uncertain, and the sources. The uncertainty section is not optional and it is not buried at the bottom in grey text. If the evidence doesn't support a confident answer, the answer isn't confident.
We made the depth visible
Simple questions are answered instantly. Hard questions take longer, and you can now see what TRUE is reading while it works. Reasoning you can't inspect is just a slower black box.
We added claim check
The most common way people lose money is acting on a confident claim that nobody checked. So we built a feature that does nothing but check claims — what the data supports, what it doesn't, and what the post conveniently omitted.
What we removed
This is the part we most want to be clear about. TRUE does not tell you what to buy or sell. It does not issue price targets. It does not predict prices. It does not place orders, hold your funds, or act on your behalf.
Some of that was a product decision and some of it was a values decision, and we're comfortable with both. The category is full of tools promising certainty in a domain that does not contain any. We'd rather build the thing that makes you a better analyst than the thing that sells more subscriptions.
Research is the product. The decision stays with you.
See what changed.
Ask a question and read the sources.
For research and education. Not financial advice.